PHALSBOURG & BEINHEIM

Three European originals

Original pages replace copied citations, while the missing Louisiana relationship stays unresolved.

23 July 1720, Phalsbourg

The church act blesses, confirms and ratifies the already contracted marriage of Joseph Vagenspach and Anne Barbe Ackermannin. It names his father Jean and deceased mother Margueritte, and her parents Michel and Marie of Beinheim. It explicitly refers to Louisiana transport, but names no ship or Louis child.

30 May 1697, Beinheim

Anna Barbara’s baptism names Michael Ackermann and Maria as parents. The names, parents and place make a probable match to the later bride. Baptism is not a documented birth date.

19 April 1680, a candidate family

A widower Michael Ackermann marries Maria, with her surname provisionally read Abwenden. Family continuity and a second reading remain necessary before attaching grandparents.

Sources & further reading
  • PHAL1720Phalsbourg church act: Joseph and Anne Barbe, 1720

    Original archive register image

    Open source
  • BEIN1697Beinheim baptism register: Anna Barbara, 1697

    Original archive register image

    Open source
  • BEIN1680Beinheim marriage register: Michael and Maria, 1680

    Original archive register image

    Open source
Where does the early Waguespack line begin?

Joseph Wagensbach and Anne Barbe Ackerman are documented historical people. Their identification as the elder Jean Louis’s parents remains unproved.

THE CASE FILE

What the records actually say.

  1. 1697 · A baptism in Beinheim

    The original names Anna Barbara, daughter of Michael Ackermann and Maria, baptized May 30. Matching this child to the later bride remains probabilistic.

    Evidence: E34
  2. 1720 · Marriage confirmed at Phalsbourg

    The original July 23 act names Joseph and Anne Barbe, their parents and Louisiana transport context. It confirms an existing marriage; no ship or child Louis is named.

    Evidence: E39
  3. 1753–1794 · Associations and competing identities

    Louis appears in a connected household as a baptismal sponsor. Later civil abstracts connect a Louis to the Edelmeier family, but wife and widow identifications conflict.

    Evidence: E03, E14, E20

TEST THE EXPLANATIONS

Competing theories.

Possible connection

Joseph and Barbe were Louis’s parents

What supports itThe surname, period and household associations make the couple worth investigating.

What holds it backNo inspected record explicitly gives Louis as their son. Association is not the missing parent–child statement.

Probable identity

The 1697 child was the later Anne Barbe

What supports itThe name, parental given names and Beinheim origin agree with the 1720 act.

What holds it backA baptism is not an exact birth date. Intervening records and the 1680 surname reading need further review.

Unsupported extension

Medieval Wagenspach records extend the pedigree

What supports itHistorical name forms establish that the name existed much earlier.

What holds it backThey do not connect the medieval people to this family, prove noble descent or establish a migration chain.

THE DETAILS THAT MATTER

Keep the contradictions in view.

  • Madeleine Edelmeier versus Marguerite Visi remains a wife/widow identity conflict.
  • The inherited 1794 death and a partition date must not be treated as the same event.
  • Auenheim near Fort-Louis is a place hypothesis; the original origin wording and Schwobsheim alternative remain unresolved.

THE NEXT BREAKTHROUGH

What remains to be discovered.

  1. Obtain the complete 1794 partition and the original or reliable full transcription of the 1758 inheritance material.
  2. Look for Joseph/Barbe estate, guardianship or settlement records that explicitly identify children.
  3. Compare the original parish entries and intervening family records before attaching earlier generations.
Evidence: E15, E18, E25, E40, E45

Follow the existing research plan →

THIS STORY CAN GO FURTHER

What we can investigate next

See the records needed and what they could reveal →

Photo details